Ah now i see……it was citing narahari that made narayanan so confident……….. hmm……… a feeling of superiority……..may be i should have said that i wanted a quick and dirty way and so picked up narahari.???????? Hmm………may be……

idle thoughts

Can analytic and geometric thinking can be thought of as exploring/pushing the boundaries from within…….., while geometric as getting out of the actual solid/surface/object and defining the actual boundary conditions??? hmm……..
Interesting analogy…but this may explain why i think geometric is more accurate, while analytic is more speculative